Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  18 / 92 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 18 / 92 Next Page
Page Background

18

In conversation

|

Dr Zongbo Wang

and high-level decision making based

on the data, so this is very suitable for

UAVs,” he says.

“That is because it’s easy to schedule

the tasks, especially for some critical

scheduling tasks and making sure there

are no delays. If you have the MPU and

FPGA combined then you can partition

the tasks for more real-time and time-

critical functions in the FPGA fabric.

“If you only have an MPU then you

have to rely on an operating system,

so you are mixing different tasks – you

need low-level comms handling that

includes connection to the ground

station, and you need position estimation.

Then you need some sensor information,

and this is the third important element of

the control algorithm.

“This then uses the data from the

mission tasks to determine how fast to

turn the rotors and so on. Now an MPU

makes all these decisions together, and

I don’t think that should be the most

optimised case.”

Power consumption

There are major advantages with an

FPGA as the demands on the UAV

control systems grow. Dr Wang points

to other approaches using graphics

processing units (GPUs) which may

have up to 512 processing elements and

are being used in some UAV designs.

“All the chip makers are looking to

reduce power, and if you use an FPGA

to do the processing then you may find

it uses even less power than a GPU,”

he says. “FPGAs have not been more

widely used because the technology in

them is more challenging for engineers

from an aerospace background. There

are questions about how to partition the

design of the control system between

the FPGA and the ARM processors.

FPGAs are seen as too complicated to

programme for a flight control engineer.”

So the latest design tool from Xilinx,

called SDSoC, takes a design written in

C or C++ code and profiles the code to

find the areas that would most benefit

from being implemented in the logic

fabric. This then allows some elements of

the design to run on the Linux operating

system on one core, with the high-

performance functions running on the

logic fabric, providing the best of both

worlds without having to change the way

the engineer designs the system.

Aerotenna has taken the ArduPilot

open source autopilot and performed

this optimisation alongside the radar

sensor design.

“Our plan is to partition the processing

to use the FPGA logic to do some of the

tasks alongside the ARM cores, such as

PWM coding and decoding – every UAV

needs that. In an MPU it is hundreds of

lines, while in the FPGA it is less than

100 lines to implement such a function in

real time,” he says.

This approach opens up new ways

of building UAV control systems with

different design blocks of intellectual

property (IP). “There will be a lot of these

IP blocks,” says Dr Wang. “We will use

a drag-and-drop model so that you

drag the function from the IP library and

connect it to the ARM core. Then the

core will run only the high-level functions

and use the FPGA logic to do the rest.”

The first step for this is the combined

autopilot and radar system called

μSharp. This incorporates adaptive

sensing technology that optimises its

response, regardless of flight status. It

detects obstacles all around without

blind spots and corrects flight course in

time to prevent collisions.

Dr Wang says, “We have the demo

systems and are moving to production.

We can work with commercial drones

of less than 1.5 kg – the most widely

available systems on the market – and

are doing this development in parallel.”

Sensor fusion

This technology is the way forward for

UAV designs, he says. “I believe radar

can do a great job and has advantages

over a lot of sensors, but the future

needs to be a package of sensors, and

a combination of radar, ultrasound and

camera integrated in UAVs to do a smart

job. That’s the second important element

which is sensor fusion, and that will

take the application of FPGA in UAVs to

another level.

“Now we have an excellent collision

avoidance system but we are not

stopping there; we are putting cameras

on the platform with sensor fusion.”

With thanks to Aaron Behman of Xilinx

for his contribution to this article.

June/July 2016 |

Unmanned Systems Technology

Using an FPGA is changing how UAVs are

controlled by making the processing of

algorithms more efficient